In collaboration with the
International Astronomical Union

Theme: Indigenous uses of Astronomy

  • InfoVersion: 9
    Status: PUB
    Date: 2022-04-08 18:33:16
    Author(s): Jarita Holbrook, Stephen McCluskey, Clive Ruggles

In one sense, all cultural uses of astronomy are indigenous, whether past or present. In practice, though, the term ‘indigenous’ is commonly taken to apply only to people outside the ‘Western’ framework of thought, given the global nature of modern science. This introduces a dichotomy that parallels the differences of approach between historians of astronomy—who tend to focus upon places, discoveries and people significant in the development of modern scientific astronomy—and those such as archaeoastronomers who generally take a more anthropological perspective, striving to recognise human achievements in their own terms and to emphasize cultural diversity.

There is no hard-and-fast boundary between practices among indigenous communities in the present or recent past and those in the more distant past. It might seem that the obvious dividing line is the existence, or not, of ethnographic evidence: evidence from ‘live informants’. However, ethnographic data does not remain current: it itself ages, and then becomes historical. The ‘ethnohistoric’ evidence of the European chroniclers who recorded the vestiges of Native American traditions shortly after the conquest is a key factor in interpreting many sites in pre-Columbian America.

The existence of ethnographic data does not remove the need to consider other forms of evidence in interpreting cultural sites. Ethnographic evidence in the form of a reliable informant giving direct information about the meaning and use of a place is a virtually unattainable ideal, for a variety of reasons: some of the more obvious ones are the ethnographer’s bias in selecting what questions to ask, or not understanding the answer in their own terms because of not sharing the world-view of the informant, or not having the privilege to be given sacred information. As ethnography ages into ethnohistory, all this is compounded with additional problems of historical interpretation. Finally, if one is interested in the cultural significance and meaning of a site at some time in the past, then it is questionable how relevant the ‘living tradition’ is to the practices that defined the place at a (possibly considerably) earlier time.

In this theme we focus on places where some element of ‘modern’ ethnography (not more than, say, two centuries old) is considered relevant to the interpretation of sites. As we shall see, this does not eliminate the sort of methodological issues inherent in the interpretation of archaeoastronomical evidence—such as the possibility of fortuitous occurrences of impressive alignments and hierophanies—encountered in the preceding themes. Forming the most sustainable interpretation involves a suitable balance between these different types of evidence—ethnographic, historical, archaeological and statistical.

In such an interdisciplinary field of enquiry, terminology is a significant issue, since the term used can carry unfortunate and unintentional overtones. For example, if ‘observatory’ is taken to mean a place constructed for the exclusive, or main, purpose of astronomical observations then it is likely to be inappropriate in almost any indigenous context; however, the term ‘observatory’ is generally acceptable if it is taken to mean any place where astronomical observations were actually carried out (for whatever purpose). We adopt the latter meaning here. Likewise, ‘astronomy’ makes more sense in the indigenous context if it is taken in a broad sense to encompass activities, artwork, and measurements related to the sky carried out by people who would not be considered ‘astronomers’ in any modern sense (i.e. specialists). In this case, the term ‘indigenous astronomy’, or even ‘indigenous astronomies’, is to be preferred to ‘indigenous uses of astronomy’. In what follows, we refer to ‘indigenous astronomy’ in this latter sense.

Examples of indigenous astronomy can be found on every continent. Mindful of the four types of cultural property associated with astronomical heritage that were identified by the Astronomy and World Heritage Initiative at its outset, it is helpful to distinguish (i) physical sites that are connected to indigenous astronomy; (ii) practices and activities such as navigation that are connected to indigenous astronomy; and (iii) indigenous astronomy concepts found in oral forms and other intangible forms such as origin stories, songs, dances, and rituals, and calendars. Only the first represents fixed tangible heritage, the other two categories being intangible.


Physical sites connected to indigenous astronomy 
  • InfoVersion: 7
    Status: PUB
    Date: 2022-04-08 18:34:06
    Author(s): Jarita Holbrook, Stephen McCluskey, Clive Ruggles

In contrast to the observatories used for scientific astronomy, the places where people made regular observations of the night sky in an indigenous context reflect the cultural applications of those observations, such as timekeeping, setting the local calendar, or the needs of religion.

For example, the Ngas people of Nigeria follow a calendar based on regular observations of the moon. The moon is important to the Ngas and their monthly activities and agricultural activities are based on this lunar calendar. They look for the first crescent moon to appear on the western horizon every month, and their biggest festival is based on observing the first crescent moon of their New Year. The week-long festival activities include ritually cleaning their homes and their village, gift giving, and drinking ‘the moon’s beer’. A ceremony with the ‘sons of the moon’— young boys whose faces are decorated with the full moon—involves the boys shooting arrows into the sky to kill the old moon in order for the new crescent moon to be born. The timing of their shooting the moon is precise: the first crescent moon must be sighted the next evening. If the timing is wrong, the villagers will fall ill. The priest who determines the calendar has an exact location where he stands to make the moon observations, and so there is a physical site connected to his moon-watching.

It is more challenging to interpret the evidence where traditional practices have been substantially modified, forgotten or lost, and conclusions must be derived from historical or archaeological evidence alone. For example, there is a group of Native North American sites that seem to combine petroglyphs or rock art and physical obstructions that together create light-and-shadow events marking certain days of the year. An example is the ‘sun dagger’ of Fajada Butte, New Mexico, USA, where a dagger of sunlight cast by a gap between two slabs of rock bisects a large spiral carving around noon on the summer solstice. Unfortunately, while there has been a lot of research on these sites, there is still debate and controversy as to whether these light and shadow events were intentionally designed by the people who constructed each site, or simply coincidence.

This sort of methodological issue is also encountered in other thematic contexts such as earlier prehistory, later prehistoric Europe and pre-Columbian America. Similar remarks apply to the other well studied ways in which places may directly reflect indigenous practices relating to astronomy: the alignment of buildings and structures upon the rising and setting positions of celestial bodies. It is generally accepted, for example, that some of the great cities of pre-Columbian America contained astronomical alignments serving purposes connected both to religious practices and political control; in many cases, observations of celestial events reinforced the divine right of the kings to rule.

Unlike the well-known and richly documented astronomical traditions of Mesoamerica, the astronomical traditions of the indigenous peoples of North America left no written historical record, a comparatively scant physical record, and only few ‘astronomical’ monuments. Thus archaeological records, combined with early ethnographic accounts, provide the principal evidence of these astronomies. The accounts tell us that the native peoples saw the land as sacred, and in some cases an element of this sacred landscape was the way in which it joined the Earth and the Sky. Holy places that joined the Earth and Sky sometimes memorialized celestial beings; sometimes marked the times of the planting and ceremonial calendar. Sunwatching sites were numerous: some Sun shrines, although well attested historically, are associated with living pueblo peoples and therefore, because of their current ritual uses, not available for public inspection. However, one group of sites, Navajo star ceilings (USA), are not known to be subject to current ritual uses and memorialize the astronomical concerns of the Navajo.

Meteor craters and meteor scatter fields often become sacred landscapes linked to the sky for different indigenous groups. An example of this is the relation of the Moqoit People of the Southwest of the Argentine Chaco with the great dispersion of metallic meteorites of Campo del Cielo (see the IAU list of Astronomical Heritage in Danger).


Practices and activities connected to indigenous astronomy 
  • InfoVersion: 5
    Status: PUB
    Date: 2017-11-08 20:51:47
    Author(s): Jarita Holbrook, Stephen McCluskey, Clive Ruggles

Navigation temple (<i>heiau</i>) at Holo Moana, Is

Fig. 1. Navigation temple (heiau) at Holo Moana, Island of Hawai‘i, Hawaiian Islands. Photograph © Clive Ruggles

Navigation is perhaps the most obvious example of a practice with strong connections to indigenous astronomy. Navigation by the stars, especially mid-ocean, required a good knowledge of the night sky and its daily and seasonal motions. Elements of the navigational knowledge and skills of several ethnic groups in the Pacific have been recorded in the mid- to late 20th century, including peoples in Micronesia, Melanesia, and Polynesia. In some cases navigation practices are directly linked to physical sites, such as navigation temples and voyaging stones with directional markers. They are also linked to indigenous concepts such as the ‘star compass’ of the Caroline Islands—a mental construct whereby the navigator memorises the relative rising and setting positions of about 15 stars and, at any time or place, observes those few that are actually close to the horizon and ‘imagines’ the rest.

Many other practices and activities are connected to indigenous astronomy through local calendars. Observations of celestial bodies help to regulate calendars that are also connected to the timing of planting, irrigation, harvesting and other agricultural activities on the one hand, or tied to determining the religious or ceremonial calendar on the other.


Indigenous astronomy concepts found in intangible forms 
  • InfoVersion: 7
    Status: PUB
    Date: 2012-04-13 09:37:39
    Author(s): Jarita Holbrook, Stephen McCluskey, Clive Ruggles

Calendars themselves are intangible concepts related to indigenous astronomy. Some have particular significance because of their unique characteristics. One such example is the calendar of the Mursi, a community of transhumant herders and cultivators from the lower Omo valley region of south-west Ethiopia. The Mursi reckoned time using lunar cycles (but also some observations of the sun and stars) in a way that, to Western sensibilities, appears haphazard but in practice ‘self-adjusted’ so that it was wholly fit for purpose. From a perspective that is keen to explore the diversity of indigenous astronomy the Mursi calendar is significant because it counters virtually every assumption that those who extrapolate the ‘path of progress’ approach too incautiously tend to make about the way in which calendars inevitably developed. Another example is the extraordinary ‘luni-stellar’ calendar of the Borana of southern Ethiopia and northern Kenya, which makes extensive use of the faint constellation Triangulum.

The fragility of this type of heritage is emphasized by the changes that have occurred since the Mursi calendar was recorded in the late 1960s and early 1970s, before it came into contact with external calendars.

Indigenous astronomy concepts include a range of ideas, beliefs, and understandings connected to the sky that may not be attached to a physical site. These include weather prediction; celestial deities such as solar, lunar, and stellar gods and goddesses; and ‘sun kings’ as an example of rulers who attribute the right to rule to a direct connection to a celestial body. Cosmological concepts may also be made real in physical structures such as the planning of cities and tombs.

Returning to the example of the Ngas of Nigeria, in addition to focusing on the moon to establish their calendar, they look at the tilt of the first crescent moon each month to determine the strength of the seasonal rains. Although there is no underlying physics to explain it (in other words, it doesn’t make sense in ‘our’ western rationality) it is as much a part of ‘their’ rationality as the calendrical observations mentioned earlier. The importance of the moon to the Ngas is also expressed in the form of drawn and painted images of the moon that are found throughout their society. This includes those painted annually on the face of young boys during their new-year ceremony—another level of intangible heritage.


The ’value’ of indigenous astronomy 
  • InfoVersion: 13
    Status: PUB
    Date: 2017-11-08 22:02:58
    Author(s): Jarita Holbrook, Stephen McCluskey, Clive Ruggles

Indigenous astronomy is a challenge for the Astronomy and World Heritage Initiative because there are often no material remains or tangible heritage associated with it, and where there is tangible heritage it is often several steps removed from the actual act of observing the sky. This makes it all the more important to try to comprehend the nature of these indirect links where they do exist.

In 2008, members of the IAU’s Astronomy and World Heritage Working Group, later to become IAU Commission C4 on World Heritage and Astronomy, examined UNESCO’s World Heritage List for sites that are connected to astronomy, including those connected to indigenous astronomy. The resulting list (Table 1) is not exhaustive: for example, among the other sites that might be added is Strasbourg Grande Île. But what perhaps stands out most is that the great majority of the sites on the Working Group’s list do not have a connection with modern scientific astronomy or its history. In other words, most are connected to indigenous astronomy in its broadest sense (i.e. stretching back into the remote past).

Table 1. Sites on the World Heritage List identified by the IAU Astronomy and World Heritage Working Group as having a connection to astronomy or indigenous astronomy.

CountryEstablished World Heritage Site With Possible Connections to Astronomy
Argentina936Cueva de las Manos, Río Pinturas
Australia447 Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park
Bolivia567Tiwanaku: Spiritual and Political Centre of the Tiwanaku Culture
Bolivia883Fuerte de Samaipata
Chile715 Rapa Nui National Park
China881 Temple of Heaven: An Imperial Sacrificial Altar in Beijing
China441 Mausoleum of the First Qin Emperor
China1003 Longmen Grottoes
China439bis Imperial Palaces of the Ming and Qing Dynasties in Beijing and Shenyang
China707 Historic Ensemble of the Potala Palace, Lhasa
Columbia744San Agustín Archeological Park
Columbia743 National Archeological Park of Tierradentro
Egypt88Nubian Monuments from Abu Simbel to Philae
Egypt86 Memphis and its Necropolis—The Pyramid Fields from Giza to Dahshur
Egypt87 Ancient Thebes with its Necropolis
France83bisPalace and Park of Versailles
France85 Prehistoric Sites and Decorated Caves of the Vézère Valley
Greece392Temple of Apollo Epicurius at Bassae
Greece595 Pythagoreion and Heraion of Samos
Greece941 Archaeological Sites of Mycenae and Tiryns
Greece517 Archaeological Site of Olympia
Greece491 Sanctuary of Asklepios at Epidaurus
Greece393 Archaeological Site of Delphi
Greece404 Acropolis, Athens
Guatemala64 Tikal National Park
Guatemala149Archaeological Park and Ruins of Quirigua
Honduras129 Maya Site of Copan
India246 Sun Temple, Konârak
India243 Ellora Caves
India244Elephanta Caves
Indonesia592 Borobudur Temple Compounds
Ireland659 Archaeological Ensemble of the Bend of the Boyne
Italy787 The Trulli of Alberobello
Italy94Rock Drawings in Valcamonica
Italy829 Archaeological Areas of Pompei, Herculaneum and Torre Annunziata
Italy831Archaeological Area of Agrigento
Kenya801bis Lake Turkana National Parks
Korea977Gochang, Hwasun and Ganghwa Dolmen Sites
Mali119 Timbuktu
Mali516 Cliff of Bandiagara (Land of the Dogons)
Malta132bis Megalithic Temples of Malta
Mexico714 Rock Paintings of the Sierra de San Francisco
Mexico415 Historic Centre of Oaxaca and Archaeological Site of Monte Albán
Mexico791Pre-Hispanic Town of Uxmal
Mexico414Pre-Hispanic City of Teotihuacan
Mexico483 Pre-Hispanic City of Chichen-Itza
Mexico411Pre-Hispanic City and National Park of Palenque
Mexico412Historic Centre of Mexico City and Xochimilco
Mexico631El Tajin, Pre-Hispanic City
Mexico939 Archaeological Monuments Zone of Xochicalco
Mexico1061 Ancient Maya City of Calakmul, Campeche
Norway352Rock Art of Alta
Peru548Río Abiseo National Park
Peru700Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana
Peru274 Historic Sanctuary of Machu Picchu
Peru273 City of Cuzco
Peru330 Chavin (Archaeological Site)
South Africa985 uKhahlamba / Drakensberg Park
Sudan1073 Gebel Barkal and the Sites of the Napatan Region
Sweden557 Rock Carvings in Tanum
Syria23Site of Palmyra
Togo1140 Koutammakou, the Land of the Batammariba
Turkey448Nemrut Daǧ
United Kingdom373bis Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites
United Kingdom795Maritime Greenwich
United Kingdom514 Heart of Neolithic Orkney
USA27Mesa Verde National Park
USA353 Chaco Culture
USA198Cahokia Mounds State Historic Site
Uzbekistan603Samarkand – Crossroads of Cultures
Zimbabwe306 Matobo Hills
Zimbabwe364Great Zimbabwe National Monument


Select bibliography 
  • InfoVersion: 6
    Status: PUB
    Date: 2017-11-09 09:49:04
    Author(s): Jarita Holbrook, Stephen McCluskey, Clive Ruggles

  • Bostwick, T. and Bates, B. (2006). Viewing the Sky through Past and Present Cultures. Phoenix: Pueblo Grande Museum.
  • Chamberlain, Von Del, Carlson, J.B. and Young M.J., eds (2005). Songs from the Sky: Indigenous Astronomical and Cosmological Traditions of the World. Bognor Regis: Ocarina Books.
  • Galaal, M. (1968). The Terminology and Practice of Samali Weather Lore, Astronomy, and Astrology. Magadishu: Muusa Galaal.
  • Gladwin, T. (1970). East is Big Bird: Navigation and Logic on Puluwat Atoll. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Holbrook, J., Medupe, R.T., and Urama, J., eds. (2008). African Cultural Astronomy. Berlin: Springer.
  • King, D.A. (1993). Astronomy in the Service of Islam. Hampshire: Variorum.
  • Selin, H., ed. (2000). Astronomy across Cultures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Vaiškūnas, J., ed. (2008). Astronomy and Cosmology in Folk Traditions and Cultural Heritage. Klaipėda: Klaipėda University Press (Archaeologia Baltica 10).
  • Zedda, M. and Belmonte, J.A., eds. (2007). Light and Shadows in Cultural Astronomy. Isili, Sardinia: Associazione Archeofila Sarda.


The contents of this page are based upon text in the ICOMOS-IAU Thematic Study no. 1 (2010). Original text © Clive Ruggles, Michel Cotte and the contributing authors.